Założenie i cel przedmiotu:
1. Doprowadzenie kompetencji językowej studentów do poziomu minimum B2 (CEFR).
2. Wykształcenie umiejętności efektywnego posługiwania się językiem ogólnoakademickim oraz językiem specjalistycznym, w zakresie czterech sprawności językowych.
3. Doskonalenie umiejętności pracy z tekstem fachowym o tematyce technicznej.
4. Doskonalenie umiejętności funkcjonowania na międzynarodowym rynku pracy oraz w życiu codziennym.
Forma zaliczenia:
zaliczenie z oceną (prezentacja, kolokwia, prace pisemne), egzamin (pisemny i ustny): weryfikacja leksyki (w tym ESP) i gramatyki ma poziomie B2
ASSESSMENT OF SPEAKING - 10 points
Number of points | Grade |
9-10 | 5.0 |
8 | 4.5 |
7 | 4.0 |
6 | 3.5 |
5 | 3.0 |
0-4 | 2.0 |
|
| ||||
Number of points | REQUIREMENTS |
| |||
CONTENT |
| ||||
3 | topic presented in an exhaustive and logical way |
|
| ||
2 | a good utterance covering most of the required information |
| |||
1 | very limited content presented in a chaotic way |
| |||
0 | no language produced |
|
| ||
GRAMMAR |
| ||||
3 | correct, few language mistakes, a wide range of grammar structures |
|
| ||
2 | language produced ensuring communication |
| |||
1 | mistakes interfering with the understanding of the utterance |
| |||
0 | mistakes that prevent understanding or no language produced |
| |||
VOCABULARY |
| ||||
3 | extensive vocabulary |
|
| ||
2 | vocabulary at a good level |
| |||
1 | limited vocabulary |
| |||
0 | very limited vocabulary or no language produced |
| |||
PRONUNICATION AND INTONATION |
| ||||
1 | correct pronunciation and intonation, few mistakes | ||||
0 | pronunciation and intonation that make understanding impossible | ||||
Literatura podstawowa:
1. Dubicka, Iwona, Margaret O’Keeffe, Bob Dignen, Mike Hogan, Lizzie Wright. 2018. Business Partner B1+. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
2. Bednarska-Wnęk M, Kwiecińska A: Transport and Logistics, SPNJO Politechniki Krakowskiej 2004.
3. Murphy, Raymond. 2012. English Grammar in Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Literatura uzupełniająca:
Williams, Ivor. 2007. English for Science and Engineering. Boston: Thomson ELT.
Ibbotson, Mark. 2009. Professional English in use – Engineering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cotton, David, David Falvey, Simon Kent. 2010. Market Leader Intermediate. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
Thomson, A.J, A.V. Martinet. 2001. A Practical English Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Taylor, Liz. 2001. International Express Intermediate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pilbeam A, O’Driscoll N: Market Leader. Logistics Management, Pearson Education Limited 2010
- Nauczyciel: Aleksandra Jankowiak-Bernaciak
Założenie i cel przedmiotu:
1. Doprowadzenie kompetencji językowej studentów do poziomu minimum B2 (CEFR).
2. Wykształcenie umiejętności efektywnego posługiwania się językiem ogólnoakademickim oraz językiem specjalistycznym, w zakresie czterech sprawności językowych.
3. Doskonalenie umiejętności pracy z tekstem fachowym o tematyce technicznej.
4. Doskonalenie umiejętności funkcjonowania na międzynarodowym rynku pracy oraz w życiu codziennym.
Forma zaliczenia:
zaliczenie z oceną (prezentacje, kolokwia, prace pisemne); egzamin (ustny i pisemny) weryfikacja leksyki (w tym ESP) i gramatyki ma poziomie B2
ASSESSMENT OF SPEAKING - 10 points
Number of points | Grade |
9-10 | 5.0 |
8 | 4.5 |
7 | 4.0 |
6 | 3.5 |
5 | 3.0 |
0-4 | 2.0 |
|
| ||||
Number of points | REQUIREMENTS |
| |||
CONTENT |
| ||||
3 | topic presented in an exhaustive and logical way |
|
| ||
2 | a good utterance covering most of the required information |
| |||
1 | very limited content presented in a chaotic way |
| |||
0 | no language produced |
|
| ||
GRAMMAR |
| ||||
3 | correct, few language mistakes, a wide range of grammar structures |
|
| ||
2 | language produced ensuring communication |
| |||
1 | mistakes interfering with the understanding of the utterance |
| |||
0 | mistakes that prevent understanding or no language produced |
| |||
VOCABULARY |
| ||||
3 | extensive vocabulary |
|
| ||
2 | vocabulary at a good level |
| |||
1 | limited vocabulary |
| |||
0 | very limited vocabulary or no language produced |
| |||
PRONUNICATION AND INTONATION |
| ||||
1 | correct pronunciation and intonation, few mistakes | ||||
0 | pronunciation and intonation that make understanding impossible | ||||
Literatura podstawowa:
1. Dubicka, Iwona, Margaret O’Keeffe, Bob Dignen, Mike Hogan, Lizzie Wright. 2018. Business Partner B1+. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
2. Esteras, Santiago Remacha, Elena Marco Fabre. 2007. Professional English in Use. ICT. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Murphy, Raymond. 2012. English Grammar in Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Literatura uzupełniająca:
Williams, Ivor. 2007. English for Science and Engineering. Boston: Thomson ELT.
Ibbotson, Mark. 2009. Professional English in use – Engineering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cotton, David, David Falvey, Simon Kent. 2010. Market Leader Intermediate. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
Esteras, Santiago Remacha. 20015. Infotech. English for Computer Users. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thomson, A.J, A.V. Martinet. 2001. A Practical English Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Taylor, Liz. 2001. International Express Intermediate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Nauczyciel: Aleksandra Jankowiak-Bernaciak
Założenie i cel przedmiotu:
1. Doprowadzenie kompetencji językowej studentów do poziomu minimum B2 (CEFR).
2. Wykształcenie umiejętności efektywnego posługiwania się językiem ogólnoakademickim oraz językiem specjalistycznym, w zakresie czterech sprawności językowych.
3. Doskonalenie umiejętności pracy z tekstem fachowym o tematyce specjalistycznej.
4. Doskonalenie umiejętności funkcjonowania na międzynarodowym rynku pracy oraz w życiu codziennym.
Forma zaliczenia:
zaliczenie z oceną (prezentacje, kolokwia, prace pisemne); egzamin (pisemny i ustny) - weryfikacja leksyki (w tym ESP) i gramatyki ma poziomie B2
ASSESSMENT OF SPEAKING - 10 points
Number of points | Grade |
9-10 | 5.0 |
8 | 4.5 |
7 | 4.0 |
6 | 3.5 |
5 | 3.0 |
0-4 | 2.0 |
|
| ||||
Number of points | REQUIREMENTS |
| |||
CONTENT |
| ||||
3 | topic presented in an exhaustive and logical way |
|
| ||
2 | a good utterance covering most of the required information |
| |||
1 | very limited content presented in a chaotic way |
| |||
0 | no language produced |
|
| ||
GRAMMAR |
| ||||
3 | correct, few language mistakes, a wide range of grammar structures |
|
| ||
2 | language produced ensuring communication |
| |||
1 | mistakes interfering with the understanding of the utterance |
| |||
0 | mistakes that prevent understanding or no language produced |
| |||
VOCABULARY |
| ||||
3 | extensive vocabulary |
|
| ||
2 | vocabulary at a good level |
| |||
1 | limited vocabulary |
| |||
0 | very limited vocabulary or no language produced |
| |||
PRONUNICATION AND INTONATION |
| ||||
1 | correct pronunciation and intonation, few mistakes | ||||
0 | pronunciation and intonation that make understanding impossible | ||||
Literatura podstawowa:
1. Evans, Virginia, Jenny Dooley, Susanne Hartley. 2015. Career Paths Physiotherapy. Newbury: Express Publishing.
2. Ciecierska, Joanna. 2012. English for Physiotherapy. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Lekarskie PZWL.
Literatura uzupełniająca:
1. Glendinning, Eric H., Ron Howard. 2007. Professional English in Use. Medicine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Murphy, Raymond. 2012. English Grammar in Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Kenny, Nick, Lucrecia Luque-Mortimer. 2008. Cambridge English First Practice Tests Plus. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited
- Nauczyciel: Aleksandra Jankowiak-Bernaciak
English for Analytics Security Students - aids for developing lexical and grammar competence
The aim of the range of activities for students taking a course in Analytics Security is to let them develop vocabulary and common grammar rules at levels B2/B2+. The course lists a range of grammar-related presentations, reading tasks, multiple choice, paraphrasing and word-building exercises as well as a number of video programmes with accompanying listening comprehension tasks.
Learning outcomes:
1. to acquire specific vocabulary connected with general, business and engineering issues,
2. know and understand grammatical and lexical rules of English and use them effectively in different types of written and oral communication,
3. to communicate in English and use a variety of communications strategies at work and in different environments,
4. to discuss general and field specific issues using an appropriate linguistic and grammatical range.
Assumed assessment and verification methods: answers to tasks assigned from sources other than the coursebook and speaking audio files sent via e-mail and verified by the teacher; tasks assigned from the coursebook checked autonomously on Business Partner platform https://english-dashboard.pearson.com/
ASSESSMENT OF SPEAKING - 10 points
Number of points | Grade |
9-10 | 5.0 |
8 | 4.5 |
7 | 4.0 |
6 | 3.5 |
5 | 3.0 |
0-4 | 2.0 |
|
| ||||
Number of points | REQUIREMENTS |
| |||
CONTENT |
| ||||
3 | topic presented in an exhaustive and logical way |
|
| ||
2 | a good utterance covering most of the required information |
| |||
1 | very limited content presented in a chaotic way |
| |||
0 | no language produced |
|
| ||
GRAMMAR |
| ||||
3 | correct, few language mistakes, a wide range of grammar structures |
|
| ||
2 | language produced ensuring communication |
| |||
1 | mistakes interfering with the understanding of the utterance |
| |||
0 | mistakes that prevent understanding or no language produced |
| |||
VOCABULARY |
| ||||
3 | extensive vocabulary |
|
| ||
2 | vocabulary at a good level |
| |||
1 | limited vocabulary |
| |||
0 | very limited vocabulary or no language produced |
| |||
PRONUNICATION AND INTONATION |
| ||||
1 | correct pronunciation and intonation, few mistakes | ||||
0 | pronunciation and intonation that make understanding impossible | ||||
Main and supplementary bibliography:
1. Dubicka, I., O'Keefe, M., Dignen, B., Hogan, M., Wright, L., Business Partner B1+, Pearson
2. Murphy, Raymond English Grammar in Use, CUP;
3. Kenny, Nick, Luque-Mortimer, Lucrecia, FCE Practice Tests 2, CUP.
- Nauczyciel: Karol Matysiak
- The aim of the range of activities for students taking a course in ICT, Transport and Management and Production Engineering is to let them develop vocabulary and common grammar rules at levels B1+/B2. The course lists a range of grammar-related presentations, reading tasks, multiple choice, paraphrasing and word-building exercises as well as a number of video programmes with accompanying listening comprehension tasks.
- Learning outcomes:
1. to acquire specific vocabulary connected with general, business and engineering issues,
2. know and understand grammatical and lexical rules of English and use them effectively in different types of written and oral communication,
3. to communicate in English and use a variety of communications strategies at work and in different environments,
4. to discuss general and field specific issues using an appropriate linguistic and grammatical range.
- Assumed assessment and verification methods: answers to tasks assigned from sources other than the coursebook and speaking audio files sent via e-mail and verified by the teacher; tasks assigned from the coursebook checked autonomously on Business Partner platform https://english-dashboard.pearson.com/
ASSESSMENT OF SPEAKING - 10 points
|
Number of points |
Grade |
|
9-10 |
5.0 |
|
8 |
4.5 |
|
7 |
4.0 |
|
6 |
3.5 |
|
5 |
3.0 |
|
0-4 |
2.0 |
|
|
|
||||
|
Number of points |
REQUIREMENTS |
|
|||
|
CONTENT |
|
||||
|
3 |
topic presented in an exhaustive and logical way |
|
|
||
|
2 |
a good utterance covering most of the required information |
|
|||
|
1 |
very limited content presented in a chaotic way |
|
|||
|
0 |
no language produced |
|
|
||
|
GRAMMAR |
|
||||
|
3 |
correct, few language mistakes, a wide range of grammar structures |
|
|
||
|
2 |
language produced ensuring communication |
|
|||
|
1 |
mistakes interfering with the understanding of the utterance |
|
|||
|
0 |
mistakes that prevent understanding or no language produced |
|
|||
|
VOCABULARY |
|
||||
|
3 |
extensive vocabulary |
|
|
||
|
2 |
vocabulary at a good level |
|
|||
|
1 |
limited vocabulary |
|
|||
|
0 |
very limited vocabulary or no language produced |
|
|||
|
PRONUNICATION AND INTONATION |
|
||||
|
1 |
correct pronunciation and intonation, few mistakes |
||||
|
0 |
pronunciation and intonation that make understanding impossible |
||||
- Main and supplementary bibliography:
1. Dubicka, I., O'Keefe, M., Dignen, B., Hogan, M., Wright, L., Business Partner B1+, Pearson
2. Murphy, Raymond English Grammar in Use, CUP;
3. Kenny, Nick, Luque-Mortimer, Lucrecia, FCE Practice Tests 2, CUP.
- Nauczyciel: Karol Matysiak
- The aim of the range of activities available to student nurses is to allow them to expand their vocabulary stock related to medical/nursing English as well as improve their grasp of common grammar rules at levels B1+/B2. The course features a variety of exercises spanning types such as multiple choice, paraphrasing, word-building, etc. It lets students practise skills such as reading and listening.
- Learning outcomes:
1. to acquire specific vocabulary connected with nursing/medicine-related issues,
2. know and understand grammatical and lexical rules of English and use them effectively in different types of written and oral communication,
3. to communicate in English and use a variety of communications strategies at work and in different environments,
4. to discuss general and field specific issues using an appropriate linguistic and grammatical range.
- Assumed assessment and verification methods: answers to tasks assigned from sources other than the coursebook and speaking audio files sent via e-mail and verified by the teacher; tasks assigned from the coursebook and Alexander Press Nursing Assistant in Video to be checked after quarantine has ended.
OCENA CZĘŚCI USTNEJ EGZAMINU Z JĘZYKA ANGIELSKIEGO (20 punktów)
|
|
ESP NURSING/MEDICINE |
|
GENERAL ENGLISH |
|
|
liczba |
WYMAGANIA |
liczba |
|
WYMAGANIA |
|
punktów |
|
punktów |
|
|
|
|
TREŚĆ PRZEKAZU |
|
|
|
|
3 |
wyczerpanie tematu w sposób |
3 |
|
pełna zgodność przekazu z |
|
|
płynny i logiczny |
|
|
zadaniem zawartym w pytaniu; |
|
|
|
|
|
płynne wypowiedzi i umiejętne |
|
|
|
|
|
podtrzymywanie dialogu |
|
2 |
wypowiedź dobra, obejmująca |
2 |
|
niepełna zgodność z zadaniem; |
|
|
większość wymaganych treści |
|
|
ograniczona płynność |
|
|
|
|
|
prowadzenia rozmowy |
|
1 |
treść przekazu bardzo |
1 |
|
Ograniczona zgodność przekazu |
|
|
ograniczona; wypowiedź |
|
|
z zadaniem; chaotyczne |
|
|
chaotyczna |
|
|
prowadzenie dialogu |
|
0 |
brak odpowiedzi |
0 |
|
brak podjęcia dialogu |
|
|
POPRAWNOŚĆ JĘZYKOWA |
|||
|
3 |
wypowiedź gramatycznie |
3 |
|
wypowiedź gramatycznie |
|
|
poprawna; nieliczne usterki |
|
|
poprawna; nieliczne usterki |
|
|
językowe |
|
|
językowe |
|
2 |
poprawność językowa |
2 |
|
poprawność językowa |
|
|
zapewniająca komunikatywność |
|
|
zapewniająca komunikatywność |
|
1 |
błędy zakłócające rozumienie |
1 |
|
błędy zakłócające rozumienie |
|
|
przekazu |
|
|
przekazu |
|
0 |
błędy uniemożliwiające |
0 |
|
błędy uniemożliwiające |
|
|
zrozumienie wypowiedzi |
|
|
zrozumienie wypowiedzi |
|
|
BOGACTWO JĘZYKOWE |
|||
|
3 |
bogate słownictwo specjalistyczne |
3 |
|
bogate słownictwo adekwatne |
|
|
i ogólne |
|
|
do tematyki |
|
2 |
słownictwo specjalistyczne i |
2 |
|
słownictwo na poziomie |
|
|
ogólne na poziomie dobrym |
|
|
dobrym, adekwatne do tematyki |
|
1 |
ograniczone słownictwo |
1 |
|
ubogie słownictwo, |
|
|
specjalistyczne i podstawowe |
|
|
ograniczające swobodne |
|
|
słownictwo ogólne |
|
|
wyrażenie myśli |
|
0 |
słownictwo bardzo ograniczone |
0 |
|
słownictwo bardzo ograniczone |
|
|
lub brak wypowiedzi |
|
|
lub brak wypowiedzi |
|
|
WYMOWA i INTONACJA (ESP + GENERAL ENGLISH) |
|||
|
2 |
poprawna wymowa i intonacja |
|
|
|
1 wymowa i intonacja z błędami, nie
mającymi większego wpływu na rozumienie wypowiedzi
0 wymowa i intonacja uniemożliwiająca zrozumienie wypowiedzi
OCENY: 0-9 ndst; 10-12 dst; 13-14 dst+; 15-16 db; 17-18 db+; 19-20 bdb
- Nursing course main and supplementary bibliography:
1. Grice, Tony., Nursing 1, OUP;
2. Murphy, Raymond English Grammar in Use, CUP;
3. Glendinning, Eric and Howard, Ron, Professional English in Use Medicine, CUP;
4. Alexander Press – Nursing Assistant Education in Video;
5. Penn J., Hanson E., Anatomy and Physiology, Pearson;
6. Kenny, Nick, Luque-Mortimer, Lucrecia, FCE Practice Tests 2, CUP.
- Nauczyciel: Karol Matysiak